Reporting Dangers of Fluoride – And Mass Medication

Mass medication through water systems of the world began in 1951 with fluoridation. The optimum level was originally set at the rate of 1 part per million (1ppm) and considered safe.Fluoridation of the public drinking water however has many risks and dangers.

The most obvious question we must ask in trying to assess the purpose of this unusual action taken to medicate the public water supplies, is to enquire as to its real purpose. Health authorities approved fluoridation ostensibly is for the improvement of the teeth of the people. The assumption is that fluoride will improve tooth enamel and that all people will require the same amount of this chemical regardless of their age.

Firstly there is irrefutable evidence from prominent medical researchers, showing this chemical that is sufficiently toxic as to have asserted its place as a rat poison, is also harmful to humans when ingested.

In spite of this, fluoride not only continues to be used in many chemical and even pharmaceutical products but has for decades been deliberately pumped into our Australian public water supplies in spite of extensive demonstrations of objection by groups and individuals. This has left a situation where those members of the community who do not wish to have the quality of their drinking water downgraded in this way must purchase water filters in their home, laboratories, factories and hospitals. Food processing and therapeutic products and industries have been particularly affected. It would be difficult to assess the negative damage to the health of the whole community.

Logical arguments have had no influence in changing the decisions of health departments and medical authorities on a national scale in Australia and will have not the power to do so as long as state governments retain the authority on health issues. Over the years, many scientists and individuals from many countries in the world have put forward their objections. These include the following points as a basis for their argument…..

Regarding the claimed benefit to dental health:
Firstly why should it be seen to be a priority over any other health issues prevalent in the community, such as heart trouble, cancer, diabetes and other diseases? Only a minute percentage of public water will be consumed by children in the suggested time frame when there is potential benefit to their developing teeth. In fact, over-dosing of fluoride produces irregularities in the enamel of children. Appreciating that the recommended safe dose is 1ppm but difficult to guarantee that pumping stations produce an accurate dilution of the toxin in amounts that are totally safe……and that a tube of toothpaste contains up to 1500 ppm and a can of commercial fruit juice contains about 2.8 ppm and mouth rinses from 230-900 ppm we can only conclude that the majority of people in western countries are probably over the toxic limit of ingestion of fluoride prior to any water content analysis. This factor alone leaves commercial enterprises open to exhaustive litigation as the councils and water authorities and even dentists. Gum irritations and allergies are common, not only in those using fluoride toothpaste but in drinking water and medical drugs that are fluorinated.
African American children are shown to be more susceptible to fluorosis or tooth mottling than whites. This demonstrates a need to consider racial constitution as a factor in mass medicine. Those who choose to medicate with fluoride and are persuaded it is to their dental benefit are free to do so through controlled tablet intake.

Need for Pure Water

It has always been acknowledged that pure water is the basis of good health so accent should be directed by responsible community guardians towards extracting any untoward elements in the water rather than injecting toxic substances into it, even at 1ppm. There is no way to demonstrate that there is any scientific way to control the amount of fluoride any individual will ingest through their water intake because of personal differences in habit, thus making it, along with any other proposed mass medication, an offence against medical principles.

Compulsory Medication is Unethical
To endure compulsory medication through water, the most essential element for health represents a pollution that offends both our aims to good health and is a crime against our democratic principles of personal freedom of choice.

Proven Dangers and Risks
Excessive fluoride or fluorine components in the body that can occur with certain medical drugs produce mild to extreme symptoms and even fatal consequences. The dangers are not only physical such as interfering with thyroid function but include extreme mental and emotional irregularities. This has been a line of research following outbreaks of violent and irrational behavior of young teenagers that have been demonstrated over the last years.

Obesity – Heart Disease – Kidney problems- Cancer –
Obesity is now reaching epidemic proportions in western countries. The toxic affect of fluoride upon the function of the thyroid gland is considered to be a causative factor. As aluminium cookware was last century considered a serious cause of cancer and dementia, fluoride toxicity is suspected of being a factor in this as in many other diseases such as bone deformation, premature aging and nerve and brain diseases. Seemingly co-incidental with fluoridation of water supplies in the twentieth century has been the explosion of cancer and other serious health issues.

Brain and Mental Disease
Many generally prescribed medications and drugs in western countries contain fluoride in considerable amount to make them questionable negative factors and suspected of being the cause of many allergies and conditions as serious as psychotic behavior, depression, and inhibited mental abilities. Warnings include many specific drugs such as Prozac, Luvoc, Lescol, Lipitor, Crestor, Baycol with the last having been removed from the American market after fatalities from adverse reactions.

Pregnant Women are advised to take no fluoride as it can damage brain function and hormones in the foetus.

Elderly are at equal risk as fluoridated water is indicated as a possible main cause of Alzheimer’s and dementia.

Children have been harmed by fluoridation and medications containing flurorine and derivatives to the extent that the numerous cases have led to parents forming support groups to lobby for changes. Most recent research shows the link between fluoride and Asperger’s disease and autism because of the accumulative lead component involved.

Political Tarnish:
Motivation for the introduction of tons of fluoride into public water supplies is tarnished by considerations that are politically rather than therapeutic in their aims. This is a subject that has been explored by some who seek a reason for such an extreme and illogical action such as fluoridation. Some go further to claim that the practice violates the Nuremberg code regarding restriction on human experimentation.

Industrial Pollution:
The practice is claimed as a convenient dumping ground for industrial wastes. Some believe that the aluminium and fertilizer industries that produce fluoride as a by-product found a convenient and profitable disposal of toxic waste in the public water supply. Fluoride buried in the earth kills plant life. In the air kills stock. In the water…?

There is an almost overwhelming amount of evidence accumulating in scientific journals and forums warning of the dangers and risks of our present water fluoridation system upon health. It is widely accepted that it is unsafe a method and entirely uncontrollable in dosage. The factor of chemical allergy and damage to physiological function also give cause for great concern. On these issues there are many doctors and scientists adding their voice and is best said by Dr Arvid Carlsson, Nobel Prize winner for Medicine (2000). “I am quite convinced that water fluoridation, in a not-too-distant future, will be consigned to medical history…Water fluoridation goes against leading principles of pharmacotherapy, which is progressing from a stereotyped medication – of the type 1 tablet 3 times a day – to a much more individualized therapy as regards both dosage and selection of drugs. The addition of drugs to the drinking water means exactly the opposite of an individualized therapy.”
Dr Peter Mansfield physician from UK and member of the advisory board to the government review of fluoridation (2000) states…

“No physician in his right senses would prescribe for a person he has never met, whose medical history he does not know, a substance which is intended to create bodily change, with the advice: ‘Take as much as you like, but you will take it for the rest of your life because some children suffer from tooth decay.’ It is a preposterous notion.” The very existence of an organization ‘Parents of Fluoride Poisoned Children’, founded by Andreas Schuld, a recognized leading expert on fluorides, says enough.

International Consent/Dissent:
The International Dental Federation (FDI) first recommended water fluoridation in 1951. In Europe, since that date it is estimated that more than 53 million people who endured water fluoridation for years are now free of its pollution. Many countries have now ceased the practice. There are now only 6 countries where the people are still compelled to drink fluoridated water: USA, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, Columbia and Singapore.

Australia – fluoridation, in spite of hot protest and many public demonstrations is now in many states. At one time the Tasmanian government sought to pass a Bill to “Prohibit public meetings on fluoridation.” Our Australian Constitution allows ‘the provision of..medical and dental services, but not so as to authorize any form of civil conscription.’ On this basis in time fluoridation and any further attempt at mass medication will be banned.

Austria – Some report fluoride has never been added to the water supply but others say in 1956. and that caries in children decreased after stopping in 1973.

Belgium -on the basis that drinking water is not the place to deliver medicinal treatment to people fluoridation was never accepted

Canada -The Green Party of Canada seeks to end water fluoridation in Canada by introducing legislation that will ban fluoridation in Canada at the federal level, effectively overriding any and all local mandates that say otherwise. At present fluoridation of water is in current use but remains a highly controversial issue.

Japan introduced in 1952, stopped 1972 with subsequent rejection of artificial fluoridation. Sweden introduced in 1952 and withdrawn 1971 Sweden banned fluorides in drinking water, toothpaste and food.

Norway – In the later 1990’s decision was taken against ever fluoridating the water

Finland introduced 1959 in one town stopped 1993 for the right of individual freedom to enjoy pure water.

Netherlands introduced 1953 withdrawn 1976 after legal ruling of the Supreme Court that there was no legal basis for fluoridation.

China- Fluoridation is banned

Czech Republic – since 1993 no treatment with fluoride has taken place on the basis of it being uneconomical, against ecological patterns, unethical, and its toxicological influence debatable.

Denmark – No Danish city has ever been fluoridated

European Union Less than 2% of the drinking water in Europe is fluoridated.

France – Fluoride is not added to treatment of water for ethical as well as medical reasons.

Germany introduced 1952 and withdrawn in 1971. It is now banned as unethical. German Democratic Republic introduced in 1959 and withdrawn 1990.

Greece – has never fluoridated water, perhaps in order to retain democratic freedom?

Hungary – once fluoridated but ceased in 1960’s and now chooses to remain so.

India – has been working hard to eliminate naturally occurring fluorides from drinking water that is high in the natural groundwater. 17 of its 32 states are afflicted with people suffering crippling skeletal fluorosis without adding more toxic material.

Israel – after serious study and recent suspension of mandatory fluoridation in 2006, it is now rejected.

Italy -has strict laws against adding fluorides to drinking water.

New Zealand – is in two minds and is recently urging promotion of fluoridation.

Northern Ireland – for a short period only fluoridation in two localities but later ceased.

Scotland – never had fluoridation been introduced and in 2004 plans to add fluoride to the country’s water system continued to be rejected.

Spain- a few areas practiced fluoridation of the water supplies

Switzerland in 2003 the country voted to cease Basel’s water fluoridation program that had been functioning for about 40 years.

Union of Soviet Socialist Republics introduced 1960 stopped 1990

United States of America 60% of the States fluoridate their water but 200 cities have withdrawn it.

UK- fluoridation is considered by many who are fighting for its ban, to be illegal medical research. They argue that its implementation is against freedom and constitutional rights of the individual. Against all opposition, efforts of health agencies continue to push for further fluoridation of Britain, with the same power as occurred at a critical time before decision to join the European Union and surrender of the national will to its dictates.

From the information which is available to us all on the internet, the problems are considerable and cannot be commented on in detail enough to satisfy our enquiry here. There are about 202,000 postings on the dangers of fluoridation and 432,000 and 727 videos on the subject on the side effects of fluoridation, presenting us with a considerable amount of data to consider if we wish to explore this controversial matter for ourselves and assess without bias the reports of professionals.

Having Kidney Disease Needn’t Mean You Can’t Have Dental Implants

All well-experienced clinicians who routinely place dental implants will take every possible precaution when planning this treatment. This includes thoroughly assessing a patient’s dental and medical health. It is particularly vital when treating people who have chronic kidney disease.

They can use this when placing dental implants in people with chronic kidney disease. The guidelines include sensible suggestions such as consulting with a nephrologist prior to surgery and following up with patients after their surgery.

Chronic kidney disease is a condition affecting approximately 11% of adults worldwide and the number of people afflicted with this disease is growing. Up to 90% of people with chronic kidney disease may have oral symptoms.

Symptoms such as gingival bleeding which is where the gums bleed, or advanced gum disease or even periodontitis can lead to problems such as early tooth loss. Another common issue is xerostomia or dry mouth, where a patient is unable to produce sufficient saliva to keep the mouth clean and comfortable. When there isn’t enough saliva, the risk of dental disease increases which is another important factor to consider for anyone wishing to have dental implants.

One problem with chronic kidney disease and poor oral health is that these conditions can worsen each other. Poor oral health increases the risk of bacteria entering the bloodstream and affecting kidney disease.

Additionally, people with loose or missing teeth will often find its very uncomfortable to eat properly and poor nutrition can affect the kidneys. Apparently, people with chronic kidney disease are less likely to visit dentists compared to healthy patients.

A lack of good dental care increases the likelihood of dental plaque which in turn increases the risk of periodontal disease.

Furthermore, another problem is that diabetes has become increasingly recognized as potentially causing chronic kidney disease. It is an added risk factor for poor oral health. People who need to undergo hemodialysis may have advanced periodontal disease which in turn can lead to jawbone loss. These patients often receive anticoagulants which increase the risk of their gums bleeding.

Dental implant dentists who treat patients with chronic kidney disease are being advised to look out for dry mouth and for a condition called parotitis. This is a condition resulting in inflammation in one or more of the major saliva glands.

Often people with kidney disease will have altered saliva chemistry that can result in increased dental calculus or tartar. Thus, they are more likely to suffer from tooth loss, overcrowding, malocclusion and from loose teeth.

The treatments used can also cause oral health problems. To further complicate things, it’s estimated that many have bone disorders. Despite this, it’s been found that the alveolar bone or the jawbone is generally still fine for dental implants.

Some dentists may avoid treating people with this condition due to the increased risks. Yet, a new medical paper published in the International Journal of Oral Science has proposed guidelines for practitioners to follow.

In addition to consulting a nephrologist, the paper recommends dental implant dentists thoroughly review their patient’s medical history. This includes their history of diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

In addition, they recommend a complete blood count and measuring bleeding times and the implant surgery be carried out on the day after hemodialysis. This can help to minimize the risk of bleeding.

After the surgery is completed, dental implant maintenance is particularly important for patients with chronic kidney disease. These precautions can easily be carried out by an experienced and skilled dental implant dentist who already takes extensive precautions when evaluating patients for surgery. They will use the most up-to-date techniques available today.

Using Computer Guided Surgery During Implant Placement

One particular technique that can be helpful is computer guided surgery. This is increasingly being used by dental implant dentists wishing to provide their patients with the very best treatment.

With this technique, patients have a cone beam CT scan in addition to dental x-rays prior to treatment being carried out. A cone beam scan provides detailed 3-D images of the jaws and is used to pre-plan surgery down to the very last millimeter.

The images allow a clinician to decide where best to place each dental implant, avoiding vital structures while maximizing use of available bone. Once the surgery is planned, the treatment plan is converted into a detailed stent that is used during oral surgery. This is used to accurately replicate the plan, greatly minimizing room for error. Often, it’s possible to use what’s called computer guided flap-less surgery.

This is where implants are inserted directly through the gum tissue eliminating the need to make incisions into the gums to expose the underlying bone. This technique can be very useful when treating patients with medical problems. This is because it reduces the risk of infection and bleeding, plus, healing is quicker and smoother.

Is It Worth Having Implant Surgery When You Have Medical Problems?

It can seem as if there is a lot to consider for implant surgery without throwing medical problems into the mix.

With this treatment being worthwhile, should you consider another way to replace missing teeth?

There are lots of advantages in having dental implants. This treatment can provide a long-term solution for tooth loss and many people have their implants for life. With dental implants, you receive stable teeth that make it easy to eat almost anything you like.

It’s easier to maintain good nutrition which in turn can help protect your general health. This could be invaluable if you have medical issues and know you have problems eating properly.

Then there are the improvements to your general sense of well-being and self-confidence. Tooth loss can be quite debilitating and many people feel self-conscious about smiling or socializing with others and will avoid sharing meals.

Implant supported teeth look extremely good. Especially as a skilled dental implant dentist will make sure they function properly and provide excellent aesthetic results, complementing your appearance.

If you do have chronic kidney disease or any other medical problems and are suffering from tooth loss, it’s worth investigating the possibility of dental implants.

Try to see a dentist who specializes in placing dental implants as they are more likely to have the knowledge required to properly assess your condition. They can give you an honest opinion as to whether dental implants will help you and they can discuss any possible complications. Once you know the pros and cons and possible risks, you can make an informed decision about whether to go ahead.

Dental Implants Are Better For Your Health And Your Wallet, Researchers Say

Although initially expensive, dental implants can save people money. Published in the International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, a new study found that dental prosthetics are cheaper than traditional tooth replacement methods because they last longer and are far more durable. Even so, dental bridges and dentures are easily the most popular replacement options. This may soon change. Why?

Longer Lasting

Dental implants are more popular than ever, in part because people are living a lot longer. In the past, dentures were deemed acceptable because patients only wore them for a few years. Now, the average usefulness of a replacement device is over a decade. As a result, patients are far more likely to invest in dental implants.

Lower Price

Drawing data from a decade of research on the subject, the study found that implants are cheaper than traditional prostheses, especially when it came to single-tooth replacement. A dental bridge, by comparison, is far more expensive and troublesome when you have a single tooth to replace. Not only can it increase the risk of gum disease, but it can also damage other teeth.

Less Maintenance

Unlike dentures, there is no need to ever remove these artificial teeth. As a permanent replacement option, they are designed to be cared for just like your natural set. That means you must brush them, floss them, and keep them clean. Compared to most other prosthetics, they require very little maintenance or specialized care. With that said, you shouldn’t lose your dentist’s number. Patients are encouraged to continue with their annual checkups even after implantation.

Clearer Speech

One of the things nobody tells you about dentures is that they may affect your speech. Even if they fit well, pronouncing certain words can be difficult for people who wear them. Because dental implants are screwed directly into you gum line and fit like your original pearly whites, there is little risk of speaking difficulties or unwanted sounds.

Eat What You Like

Dentures, bridges, and other replacement options often make it harder, even impossible to enjoy your favorite foods. This is particularly true when it comes to harder edibles that might dislodge most prosthetics. Once again, because they are permanent replacement options, implants will not shift, move, or be affected in any way if you choose to eat nuts or hard candy.

Keeps Your Smile Intact

Because they must fit over your gums, dentures change the shape of your smile, and even your face! This is also true with most other replacement options, except for implantation. Customized to fit your jawline, this replacement option will allow you to maintain the natural shape of your smile and face.

For all these reasons and more, experts and patients alike are recommending implants as the tooth replacement solution of the future.

The Function And Benefits Of Invisalign

Dentistry is today no longer just a matter of filling and extracting bad teeth. If you’re one of those silent victims of crooked teeth or a misaligned bite, a number of treatment options are available that could help to straighten your teeth. Invisalign (invisible aligners) is a modern orthodontic treatment rapidly gaining popularity as it straightens your teeth without the need of those old-fashioned traditional metal braces.

Invisible aligners use clear dental aligners in moving your teeth into the desired position. These aligners are barely visible to anyone near you. Vol. 44, Issue 11 of the Journal of Clinical Orthodontics has estimated that more than 2.5 million persons internationally have by now benefitted from the invisible aligner method of treatment.

The Way Invisible Aligners Work

When you visit an orthodontist, you’ll get dental aligners that have been designed in such a manner to fit well over your teeth and then gradually and gently work to move your teeth into a more straight display. The Invisible aligners are custom-made for your use only.

Every 2 to 3 weeks over the treatment duration, you’ll receive a new set of aligners. Each new set then adds on the accomplishment of the previous one, such that your teeth are gradually shifting throughout the entire treatment period.

Who Qualifies for Treatment?

This could be the best available option for you if you’re in need of getting orthodontic treatment. Invisible aligners also come with special systems that suit teen and minor patients.

Invisalign Teen comes along with a blue dot wear display that helps teens to remember to wear their aligners for 22 hours per day as recommended. Invisalign i7 aligners on the other hand are designed for righting minor dental cases.

Advantages of Using Invisible Aligners

Generally, braces work through the application of steady pressure over a period of time to steadily move your teeth in a specific direction. While your teeth move, the jaw bone alters its form as the pressure is getting applied.

1. Almost Invisible Being made of clear plastic material, these aligners are practically invisible such that most people might not even recognize that you’re wearing them.

2. Extremely Effective Invisible aligners have, in most cases, been found to be just as effective, if perhaps not more like the traditional metal braces. Moreover, they’re more comfortable than the conventional braces when you wear them.

3. Removable when Necessary Invisible aligners can be taken off whenever the need arises. This means that you could take them off as you eat or when you’re cleaning the teeth. This means cleaning them also becomes much easier! Given that they are totally detachable, it means that you’re not as restricted with your dietary choices like you would be whilst using the standard metal braces.

4. Less Appointments with the Orthodontist When you’re on invisible aligner treatment, fewer orthodontic appointments are required when compared to someone who is being treated using the standard metal braces.

To be more informed about this latest addition to the dentistry and orthodontics field, the International Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics as well as the Australian Orthodontic Journal would prove priceless as they normally contain the latest updates about invisible aligners.

Clear Braces: Are They Suitable For You?

Whenever dental braces are mentioned, what quickly crops into the mind are metal brackets and wires on somebody’s teeth. Fortunately, current orthodontic technology has indeed come a long way. The advantages of latest dental braces are certainly going beyond just giving you an attractive smile. This new class of dental braces is presenting opportunities of not just straightening your teeth but also raising levels of confidence together with great aesthetics.

While clear braces may not be suitable for everybody, these new dental devices are giving a huge section of the population enhanced and improved oral health options. A 1998 study looking into the development of the modern orthodontic practice that was published in the Journal of Clinical Orthodontics is however quite clear that some orthodontic techniques are not for everybody and no patient should be feeling pressurized into agreeing for the procedure.

The Benefits

Vol. 39 Issue 12 of the International Endodontic Journal proposes that when treatment options are numerous or there is presence of specific problems, these should to be explained and discussed with you and well documented. It makes good practice to also provide the patient with all relevant information in written form, including all the pros and cons of each option.

Among the more outstanding advantages include:

Most people will not even realize you’re on treatment! • Because they can be removed as required, they don’t interrupt your daily lifestyle. • As they have no irritating brackets, wire or rubber bands, they are more comfortable to wear. • They are extremely effective! It only takes about 6 months to 1 year, for you to begin noticing results. • They are very adaptable and could be used to manage all types of dental complications.

Preparing the Braces

Clear invisible braces have made the process of straightening your teeth easy. The dentist will first appraise the teeth and discuss about your end goal. Upon establishing your ‘smile’ goals, the orthodontist takes X-rays, several digital photographs and a teeth mold. All these are going to be used to create your aligners.

The collected details are then sent to the dental lab from where your individualized treatment plan gets generated. These custom made braces are produced using an exact 3D model that was taken from your own teeth. When you and your orthodontist are pleased with the treatment plan, the aligners are then built using high-tech digital dental mapping. Once they’re ready, your dentist receives them.

Treatment Process

These braces are virtually invisible and are without wires, brackets or rubber bands. They use customized removable and transparent trays. The clear aligners gradually shift your teeth until they’re straightened as preplanned; giving you that stunning smile.

You ought to have your aligners on throughout, except while you eat, brushing or flossing your teeth. • Every several weeks your orthodontist will check on your progress and give you next set of clear aligners. • The continuous wearing will steadily shift your teeth into the desired position and within one year, you will have obtained that smile you have always desired. • It is vital to stick with the instructions and guidelines given by your Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency accredited orthodontist.